Monday, May 29, 2017

Steps Forward and Back

Steps Forward and Back

My younger son with autism, who is thirty-six, has been moved to a new house. He wanted to go. In the house he was in before, the rooms were so small that his things were spread out over two rooms. He also had to pay rent for two rooms. He likes to have several things going on at once, like TV, something happening on his computer, and jumping on his trampoline. The old arrangement made that impossible. There was also only one bathroom in the old house, which created some conflicts with his roommate. The true problem for him, was that there was no basement. That put the furnace, and the noise from the loud blower, where the sound could assault his senses. The agency overseeing the house had promised to get the blower fixed, but that turned out to be impossible. Sounds from heating systems and air conditioning systems have always been painful to him. We've provided him with a white noise generator and whatever else we could, to ameliorate the situation, but there's never been a truly satisfactory solution, except for having a system where he couldn't hear it. In the new house, the furnace is in the basement, and our son has a room big enough to accommodate all his things, with an en suite bathroom of his own. The house is also well built and in a very good neighborhood not far from where my husband and I live.

My husband and I take him out every Saturday for lunch at a place of his choice. For the past few months, that has been Wendy's. A couple of weeks ago, two things happened that were very encouraging. Normally for him, a door or a window must be fully open or fully closed. Anything else in unacceptable. He will try to close partially open doors anywhere he is, even doors he has no right to be near. On that day, my husband left the storm door of my son's new house ajar about six inches. Our son didn't run back to close it. That was a first. Then, the ice dispenser in the computerized drink machine at Wendy's wasn't working. In the past, that would have caused a meltdown. That day, it didn't. There was some grumbling, but our son drank his soda without ice. My husband and I thought he was making real progress.

That conclusion lasted about two days. Then the incident reports started coming in: barging into a bathroom occupied by a roommate, public masturbation, entering a roommate's room without permission to take cans of soda, and finally, biting another client at his vocational site. Biting has been a problem with him most of his life, but we hadn't had an incident in a long time. His initial excitement and joy at having new quarters had worn off, with disputes over thermostat settings, soda supplies running out, and several cable outages bringing down the internet, that is his real connection to the world. It had been a couple of steps forward and then a giant leap back.


I believe that there has always been progress over the years, but it has never been steady, and I've rarely known a week to go by without some sort of a challenge. That is still a lot better than his younger days, when a problem free day or even an hour, might have been cause for celebration. Most days I continue to have optimism, but decades of experience have counteracted any hopes for magical cures or great leaps forward. I'll take the little victories as they come and deal with the inevitable setbacks. That's life in his neighborhood of planet autism.

Sunday, April 9, 2017

Autism Awareness Month

I remember, pre-Rainman, when autism awareness meant getting people to know the difference between artistic and autistic. That was even more problematical when both descriptions fit a particular individual, as was the case with both my sons. We, of the Autism Society, tirelessly went to talk to both college students and their professors, schooled aides that shouting at our kids was not the best choice, and dug our fingernails into our palms while getting the more intransigent principals to agree to the goals we needed in an IEP.

Granted, there are parents to whom IEP meetings are still accompanied by the rending of garments and the gnashing of teeth, but at least autism very rarely engenders a blank look anymore.

Sometimes I worry about the glamorization of autism. Teenyboppers fall for Spencer Reid on Criminal Minds and autism has become inextricably tied with savant skills. That is all well and good for individuals with autism doing nicely by exploiting their savant skills. I think I might even put one of my sons in that category, in a limited way. He doesn't look anything like a TV star and he wouldn't want to. He doesn't like drawing attention to himself. But how about all the individuals with autism who have no savant skills, or how about those for whom they make no difference because of the severity of their other disabilities? They make an occasional appearance on TV or the movies, but you don't see them much. That is a lesson from Rainman ignored. Yes Raymond could count cards beautifully but much of the rest of the world escaped him, even if he did decide that K-Mart sucked. When I saw the end of the movie, I imagined what would come next. Raymond would find that without an outside antenna, his portable TV wouldn't receive Judge Wapner in the Faraday cage of the train and he'd have a meltdown.

Some persons with autism live quite well on their own, needing no more services than the average human being. Some even live better. But many do not. Buildings can be bathed in blue light and stars play poker into the night, but most people are still woefully ignorant. They are well aware that autism exists these days, unless they live in a cave. But the everyday details of teaching someone to keep their voice down in a restaurant, or scraping feces off the wall, or kicking the ass of a money grubbing school district, those they don't know. Hollywood won't teach them, neither will t-shirts, bracelets, boots, or hats. It is up to those of us who deal with those details to tell the truth though tweets, posts, songs, and stories --- whatever we can do. Then there will truly be autism awareness.

You can see me and the autism books I've written at autismnovelist.com

Sunday, March 12, 2017

When They Grow Up

When They Grow Up

When most people think about autism, they think about children. For parents, it’s all about the right school, the right program, the right therapy. Then there’s diet and possibly pharmaceuticals. And if you do all that right, you think things will turn out okay. You don’t see that much about adults with autism, and when you do, they are often portrayed like Spencer Reid on Criminal Minds, odd but brilliant and totally functional. Would that things always turned out that way.

The truth is, that barring co-morbidities, persons with autism live a normal lifespan. That means that they will be children for the first eighteen years of it and adults for the next sixty or so. They may get to be in school into their twenties, but after that, it’s a whole new ball game. Many of the high functioning can make it through college and/or get decent jobs. Companies like Microsoft are reaching out to employ the more talented among them. That’s great!

But how about the ones who aren’t high functioning, the ones who smear their feces on walls, who head bang, who would spend their days with their hands down their pants? Do you see them on TV or in the movies? Rarely if ever. They may have savant skills like their luckier brethren, or they may not. In either case, their behaviors, despite whatever interventions have been tried, prevent them from capitalizing on them. Autism is a spectrum. Those are the two ends. There are all the ones in the middle too, each with unique sets of needs. So what is the best care for all those adults?

There are as many answers as there are individuals, and almost none of them are easy. There are the lucky ones on the high functioning end who grow up to pursue careers, launch, and fend for themselves with minimal or no supports. Then there are the ones who get some kind of a job and with periodic interventions from parents, family, and or services, make out reasonably well. But then there are all the others, who may or may not be able to hold a job, but require twenty-four seven supervision.

There are group homes, in home supports, and work programs. Some are readily available, some have huge waiting lists. All require careful consideration, and many, a great deal of planning. Choosing the right options to fit the life of a son or daughter may be a lifelong task, both frustrating and draining, but best faced with clear eyes rather than rose-colored glasses. While even with a child of normal needs, one may never cease to be a parent, with an adult with autism, one may never cease to be a guardian. It may be a job from which you can never retire, but the most important one you’ll ever hold.




Sunday, January 22, 2017

It is really easy to get angry watching confirmation hearings. It is the nature of politicians to lie. When that lie is contrary to your concept of what's right, or affects you personally, it's infuriating. For me that has applied in such matters as global climate change denial  and civil rights issues. But nothing upset me more than seeing a candidate for Secretary of Education who hadn't the vaguest idea what IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) is, or even that it is Federal law.

Those of us who have spent large chunks of our lives fighting for the rights of our kids and other people's kids, to receive a free and appropriate education, have depended on that law, its predecessor, the Education of the Handicapped act, and the state laws that support it. When I advocated, I memorized the law chapter and verse. Even then, I often sweated bullets to get a district or even an individual principal to follow it. But through all that, at least I knew that the Federal government was on my side.

If I was a parent or advocate attending an IEP meeting today, I'd be very nervous. What rights will be pulled away, or at the very least go unenforced? What will happen to the kids who lose them? Instead of a productive life, will they end up wasting away in front of a TV set --- or worse? For those of us with children with disabilities, their futures haunt our dreams. Very soon those dreams could morph into nightmares.

There is nothing more damaging in this world than willful ignorance. Even if you disagree with those in power, they should at least be able to conduct an informed and intelligent discussion.

Thursday, December 15, 2016

What?

What?

The woman who sits next to me in choir was telling a story tonight. She went down to the mail room and asked an employee there a question. The question was not directly related to his job. She mocked the fact that she didn't understand her question. She was even more disdainful of the fact that when she explained it, he didn't know the answer.

I inquired if it was possible that he might have been have been unable to give her the answer she required because he had been placed in the job by the local developmental disabilities agency. It was the sort of job that would be a good placement for an intellectually challenged person. She responded that this was possible, but if he was, he should wear a badge or something so she'd know she was working with someone of limited capability. (My more polite words, not hers.)

What? Someone is supposed to wear a badge to indicate their IQ score? I told her there are groups of people who might think that those with so called normal intelligence should do so. She took that as a joke. I was not really joking.

My mother and my older sister were in the high IQ society, Mensa. I took the test at fourteen, because it would have matter of total humiliation if I couldn't make the grade. I passed. As a result, I grew up in Young Mensa. To be considered in the intellectually disabled range generally requires an IQ score about thirty points below average. Most of my friends and I, depending on the test used, had a gap bigger than that between us and the so-called normal population, most likely including the lady sitting next to me in choir. I don't ever recall anyone proposing making the "normals" wear badges because they would be slow to work with, but there was plenty of frustration expressed about having to deal with people who couldn't keep up.

People are who they are. We all have different gifts and different levels of functioning. We don't label people as Alphas or Deltas as Aldus Huxley had his society do in Brave New World. We are all entitled to basic human rights and basic human dignity. No one is proposing that someone at any level be put in a job they are not capable of doing. But whatever the job is, if it is done competently, there is no reason for derision, if they don't have knowledge in other areas.

Sometimes “normal” folks don't have knowledge that would make them better at what they're doing. A quick example, the lady in my story doesn't read music. When the musical director mentions half notes, or rests, or musical terms, I explain them to her. Does she have any plans to learn to read music? Nope. Maybe I should hang a badge on her.



Friday, November 18, 2016

Interview with Sally Ramsey

Why did you write Galapagos Finches?
Since my sons were diagnosed with autism, it has had a profound effect on my life and my writing. I have given much thought to the possible future of a world with an ever-rising incidence of autism. Galapagos Finches explores one possible future.
Do you remember the first story you ever wrote?
I barely remember a short story I wrote at age eleven when I inherited my grandmother's typewriter. I remember a novella I wrote at age twelve, featuring my favorite hero and a heroine who was an idealized version of me. These days a story like that might be referred to as a Mary Jane. Not long after, I auditioned to join actual creative writing classes and was required to churn out a story a week. Not long after that, I started doing the same just to please myself. It is difficult to remember when I didn't love spinning stories and use the written word as a refuge.
What is your writing process?
I start with an idea and usually an ending. The first line starts me on my way and I write until I get where I think I should being going, generally to a certain word count per day. Once I finish, I usually do at least three rounds of edit/rewrites until I'm reasonably happy with what I read. Usually important points in the story are clarified during the rewrites as well as correction of continuity problems. I also attack a raft of problems with construction and just plain grammar.
Do you remember the first story you ever read, and the impact it had on you?
The first story I remember reading by myself was The Cat in the Hat. I was very proud of myself and memorized the whole thing. I couldn't wait to read more books by myself.
How do you approach cover design?
I have very little artistic talent, but I want the cover to reflect the story. I search for art that will do that. I recently found a professional to turn the art into a viable cover design.
What are your five favorite books, and why?
I honestly can't limit it to five. I like series and genres. I will immerse myself in one for a while and then move on to another. At various times in my life I've devoured science fiction, romance, mysteries, and paranormal adventures.
What do you read for pleasure?
I like books with happy endings, or books where I can't figure out what the ending will be. I love to be reassured, but I also love to be surprised. I also love biographies of interesting people, which can be almost anyone.
What is your e-reading device of choice?
I use an iPhone.
What book marketing techniques have been most effective for you?
I've found that if people develop a personal interest in me through something I've put online for free, they'll be more willing to shell out for my books. I post a chapter to a free story every day --- weekends, birthdays, and holidays included.
Describe your desk
I have a computer table next to my bed with a laptop and a monitor on it. I sit on the edge of the bed to type. I keep a stack of notebooks on my bedside table.
Where did you grow up, and how did this influence your writing?
I grew up in Newark, NJ and then in New York City. There were considerable safety issues, for several reasons. Writing was one way to find a place of security. The need to fight back is reflected in my characters, especially the female ones.
What motivated you to become an indie author?
I do have some books from a publisher, but I like the control, the speed, and especially the higher royalties.
How has Smashwords contributed to your success?
I just started on Smashwords, so I'll have to find out.
What is the greatest joy of writing for you?
I love the act of creation, whether it is in the laboratory, the kitchen, or on the page. I especially like to hear from readers whose lives I've made better, if only for a few moments. I've been told I've brought readers through hospital vigils and tough times at work. There's not much better than that.
What do your fans mean to you?
I love fans. Some of them have become friends. I learn about their families and their lives. I bask in the support and love I feel flowing back.
What are you working on next?
I'll be writing a semi-autobiographical novel. Autism will be a continuing theme.
Who are your favorite authors?
Robert Heinlein, Nora Roberts, Lynsay Sands, Earle Stanley Gardner, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Margaret Truman, Isaac Asimov, L. Frank Baum
What inspires you to get out of bed each day?
I start editing what I wrote the day before, almost immediately (about 6:00 A.M.) and post to the web. That gets me going.
Published 2016-11-18.
Smashwords Interviews are created by the profiled author, publisher or reader.Create your own interview!

Books by This Author


Galapagos Finches 
Price: $0.99 USD. Words: 18,380. Language: English. Published: November 17, 2016. Categories: Fiction » Science fiction » Utopias & dystopias
Galapagos Finches is a science fiction novella which paints a portrait of a future in which the increase in technology spawns an increase in the prevalence of a subset of the autism spectrum (Aspies), given to extraordinary skills. As those with such skills occupy increasingly higher rungs in the society of the United States, a backlash takes place.

Thursday, November 10, 2016

Food

“I don't want that cookie. It has raisins in it.”

“But you love raisins.”

“I like to eat them by themselves, not in anything.”

OR

“That has chunks in it. I can't eat it.”

“Those are tomatoes. You love tomato sauce.”

“Not with chunks in it.”

When the people of Planet NT think about problems with food, they may think about allergies or perhaps gluten sensitivities, or even vegetarianism. Lord knows we may have to cope with all of those, with loved ones on the autism spectrum. And we may throw in casein (milk protein) with the gluten as a no no. I have a cookbook to help with GFCF if you need it. Actually I have two. One, originally distributed by the Autism Research Institute, is out of print, but copies come up occasionally on Amazon. The other is free or cheap on Kindle and is also available as a cheap little paperback. But I wanted to talk about the quirkier stuff. A lot of that has to do with texture.

There are many things that may be unacceptable, or just evoke extreme anxiety. I remember watching my older son going over a fish filet for an hour, with a pair of tweezers, before creating a fish taco. He was making sure there weren't actually any bones in it. Nuts and seeds may be unacceptable. Lumps, chunks, or even bits of herb may refused. A hamburger patty and a bun may be eaten separately but refused when together. Vegetables may be anathema.

You can try insisting that what is put before your loved one must be eaten, which is very unlikely to be successful, or you can adapt. Honestly, would you eat something that made you uncomfortable? Would you want to be forced?

Adaptations are not that tough, once you understand what preferences are. There are many smooth sauces out there. If you can't find one, things can be pureed. It you leave nuts out of a cookie or cake, you may find that mini chocolate chips or butterscotch pieces are not only acceptable, but make a better cookie. If you are caretaker to someone who wants to cook for themselves, you might want to let them do so, just hang close enough for safety. You may find the amount of food they shovel into their mouths when they've cooked their own meal, astonishing. In addition, you will be teaching living skills in a non-threatening way.

The most important thing about food is reading labels. That's not always the easiest thing to do, especially if you're like me and left forty in the rear view mirror a long time ago. A magnifying app on your phone can be helpful. So can a plain old magnifying glass. 

In our family, the biggest hazard has always been MSG, which makes my younger son violent. I have met food buying caretakers who did not know that it stands for monosodium glutamate. Bad things ensued, especially from chili beans. 

Due to a quirk in the law, non-dairy does not mean casein free. If you're worried about casein, you do have to check the fine print. Forget the word natural. It doesn't mean something is good for you. The cyanide in peach pits is perfectly natural. That doesn't make eating it a good idea. The USDA organic label refers to the avoidance of artificial fertilizers and pesticides. That doesn't necessarily make the food good for you either. You still have to check on what is in it. 

Eternal vigilance can be the price of a quiet dinner and healthy son or daughter. As I've said before, the buck stops here.




Sunday, October 30, 2016

Is An Obsession Always a Bad Thing?

Ever notice how judgment of behavior varies between those who are perceived as neurologically typical (NT) and those who are not? The choir director at a church where I once sang, had a son who was totally attracted to drums from a very young age. When he was eighteen months old, his mother had to hold on to him tightly, because every time she let him loose, he would run to the church drum set. Now if he had been diagnosed as autistic, that would have been called perseveration. He might have been strongly urged toward another activity or at least emphatically chastened to leave things that didn't belong to him alone. By the time this particular child was eight, he played drums at least as well as most adult drummers and could fill in with the adult church band. What might have been called perseveration in a child with autism, was perseverance in an NT, something to be lauded and celebrated.

So where do you draw the line, and about what do you draw it? Can one be a truly excellent musician without spending every available moment practicing? Is it terrible to believe in a place for everything and everything in its place? Is it wrong to want to spend every waking hour in front of a computer? Is it bad to pursue an interest that fascinates you but bewilders your parents?

The answer is not a matter of diagnosis. The difference between perseverance and perseveration is whether it interferes with the quality of your life or enriches it, whether or not you have a label. To pursue music, art, or even cleanliness with a passion and end up with a successful career, is a good thing. To obsess over Fermat's Last Theorem until you prove it and win a Fields Prize, is a good thing. To obsess over the perfect cookie and end up with millions in sales is a good thing. To obsess over a computer to the point where you teach yourself to type, even if you can't talk, is a good thing. To obsess over the treatment of cattle until you become one of the world's leading experts is a good thing.

If you can't leave the house in the morning because you are afraid your toy cars might not be lined up just right, it is not a good thing. If you can't eat in restaurant unless you get the one table where you're willing to sit, it's not a good thing. If your food preferences limit your diet to the point where you become malnourished, it is not a good thing. If you are so obsessed with your appearance that you have to get up three hours early to get your hair and makeup right, it is not a good thing. If you insist on picking your friends depending on whether they agree with your taste in music, or cheer for the same team, it may not be a good thing.

One of the criteria for diagnosing autism is narrow interests, but it certainly does not tell the whole story. In the first of the set of paragraphs above, there are people who have been diagnosed with autism and some who have not. You could probably think of a name or two. In the second there are some who would be diagnosed with autism or OCD, or both, and those who would not.

Some with autism have savant skills in music, art, math, computers, or other bents that may be more off the wall. Sometimes parents latch on to those as a hope for a good life for their son or daughter. Sometimes it works out. Sometimes it doesn't. Savant skills and the obsessions that can accompany them can be positive, but not in a vacuum. Everyone requires at least a few living skills too. A form of communication is essential, whether verbal or by some other means. If a person can write a symphony but not make their basic needs understood, they are not going to have a great life. Similarly, an artist who can detect the tiniest detail in an object and reproduce it, but is painfully overcome with sensory bombardment, will live in constant agony. The skill, the obsession, can be great, but the failure to look at the other aspects necessary for a comfortable existence, can be a disaster.


A person, with or without autism, is a whole being with many facets. Characteristics, whether valued by the world at large or not, must be evaluated on the basis of whether they make a contribution to a complete and fulfilling life.


Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Combating Ignorance

Mark Twain said, "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so." Nowhere have his words been truer than in the history of autism. First it was assumed that autism was the fault of the parents, specifically the mother. This went on for decades. Families were torn apart, children were tossed into institutions under the theory they'd be better in their parents' absent. There were two things that were particularly odious about that situation. One was that there was no evidence for it, but professionals just accepted it as true. The other was that a particular so-called expert named Bruno Bettelheim perpetrated it, primarily by writing a book called The Empty Fortress.

Bettelheim was not only mistaken, he was a fraud. He claimed to have a doctorate in psychology. He did not. His doctorate was in art history, and even that was eventually rescinded. Did the profession check him out? No. His word taken as gospel and disseminated to the general public through talk shows such as Dick Cavett. In 1964, Bernard Rimland published Infantile Autism: The Syndrome and Its Implication for a Neural Theory of Behavior, proposing that autism was physiological, not the result of anything parents did. He fingered the limbic system in the brain, which was incorrect, but his basic theory was true and there was much evidence for it. But in the eighties when my kids were being diagnosed, I was still being asked if I was worried about having money to raise my kids when I was pregnant, or resented them in some way. Some psychology professionals were still going with the psychological state of the mother as a cause. In the nineties, Bruno Bettelheim was still appearing on Good Morning America. Even though neurological symptoms had been clearly associated with autism, it took a long time for the truth to penetrate. In all that time, many professionals who were supposed to be helping those with autism and their families, were still contributing to their misery.

Well, we know better now. Do we? In 1989 a study came out declaring the revolutionary idea that children with autism really do love their parents. Well duh! This year one came out saying the same thing. Really? In decades, no one was paying attention to what had already been learned. I remember watching my younger son use a plastic sword and big rubber gloves from under the sink to play Don Quixote, after seeing Scott Bakula play him on Quantum Leap. The problem was, that at the time, the experts had proclaimed that autistic children don't indulge in imaginative play. Uh huh.

So what do they say today? In many cases it is that kids must be hurt to alter their behavior for their own good. We've been there before too. In the eighties interventions based on Skinner's pigeons were riding high. Then people died. There was a backlash, with many forms of aversives banned in some states. Non-abusive interventions were found, like those outlined by John McGee in Gentle Teaching, or social stories, or sensory treatments by physical therapists. Some of these worked to some extent, or not, depending on the person being treated, but at least they did no harm.

But now it's back to the future. Things that were long ago established as unacceptable are acceptable again. Why? Money. There's gold in them thar hills. Parents of children with autism are now, and have always been, desperate not only to help their kids, but to make their own lives easier. They are fair game for any promise, proven or not. Schools unwilling to allocate sufficient resources search for cheap and easy solutions, whether they are proven or not. Those solutions also include medicating a large percentage of students, even if such medication has not been shown to affect long tern academic or social success. A pill is so much easier than a well executed plan suited to the unique needs of a child. Over time medications rise and fall in popularity as dangerous side effects, such as obesity, diabetes, and tardive dyskinesia(involuntary movement) are discovered. But there's always a new one, or an old one re-purposed as a new one. The drug companies rake in the profits and kids may suffer permanent damage.

So what's a parent to do? Some of you will hate to hear this. The buck stops with you, not with a teacher, school, doctor, therapist, or case manager. The first thing you have to do is develop a healthy skepticism for all of those folks, plus the popular press. If someone suggests a drug, research it. Find the scientific studies and by that I mean those with large samples and double blinds. If they don't exist, your child is a guinea pig. That may be what you want, but at least you'll be making an informed decision. If you don't speak science, find someone who does to translate for you. If you decide to go with something, keep up on it. New studies come out about efficacy and side effects. There is no shame in changing your mind when better evidence comes in. If your school isn't doing its job, call an IEP meeting. If that doesn't work, request a hearing. Better still, band with a group of parents facing the same problem. Districts only have the budget for a certain number of fights. If they get bombarded, they can and do give in.

Also remember, usually some symptoms get better, but autism doesn't end with childhood. If your sons and daughters grow up to be independent, if weird, be very grateful. But chances are very good that they will not. They will need support, and you are the one who will care the most about seeing that they get it. So take care of yourselves too. It is very likely that you are running a marathon, not a sprint. Don't exhaust all your energy out of the starting gate. You'll need it later. And never become complacent.



Saturday, October 15, 2016

When Only One Spot Will Do

When Only One Spot Will Do

Today I was sitting in Wendy's with my husband and my son DC. We were in chairs by the big screen in the back, rather than at a table. Every six months or so, DC decides on a different restaurant for our Saturday afternoon luncheon outings. Even though they are more expensive, conventional restaurants are easier, because DC will sit at whatever table the host or hostess picks. With more affordable fast food, whatever table we sit at the first time, becomes the only table he'll sit at during subsequent visits. He's also always refused to let us even order, until we were at his desired venue. If someone else is sitting there, we have to wait until it's clear.

When he was younger the wait could be painful --- literally. As he grew increasingly frustrated, DC would pinch or bite, usually me, but occasionally my husband. He would also protest constantly and we worked hard getting him to keep to an inside voice. Now, at thirty-five, we still have to urge him to keep his voice down and not to point or loom, but he no longer tries to hurt my husband or me.

Usually a wait for DC's table would only be a few minutes, until someone finished a meal. Unfortunately today, the occupants weren't eating. They had drinks, but were engaged in conversation, with no sign of when they would leave. As DC grew more and more upset, I began to think they would be there forever, but after an extremely long forty minutes, they finally took their leave.


Once we'd received our order, both DC and I were both calmer. And after lunch, full tummies made life downright rosy again. But even though it will cost us, I'm hoping that DC will decide on a new restaurant soon, one where someone else picks the table.

Check out my autism related books https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B01BJBY72U

Sunday, October 9, 2016

Be Careful What They Watch

I have two sons with autism, JJ and DC. JJ is very high functioning and independent. DC is not. When they were young, my husband and I coped with childcare by working different shifts. Since I was more of a night owl, I worked evening until early morning and my husband worked early morning until mid afternoon. We all had an early dinner together in-between.

VCR's were new at the time. My husband and I had plunked down five hundred dollars for one which my husband used to tape a few of my favorite TV shows while I was at work. One of those was the original MacGyver. While I eventually found myself screaming at the screen when I detected science flubs, I loved it, and watched some episodes over and over, rewinding my favorite parts. (Yes I know, very ASD behavior.) DC watched with me, enjoying the repetition as well.

Unlike what's on a DVR, you can keep video tapes pretty much forever, and I kept mine. Years later I still watched some of them and DC still watched with me. JJ was in high school and I held two part time chemist jobs, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. I was able to do so because I had found an after school program for DC, which used the facilities of a church across town. I picked him up in the late afternoon every weekday.

DC loved to throw things out of car windows, but the car I normally drove had windows that locked from the driver's seat, frustrating his efforts. Then for a week, my car was in the shop and I was driving a loaner with manual windows. DC had thrown his shoes and anything else he could get his hands on out of the windows until I locked just about everything except minimal clothing in the trunk. I had almost made it home from DC's program when I looked back and realized DC was no longer in the back seat. An angel on my shoulder kept me from sharply hitting the brakes. I slowed down gently, pulled over, and got out of the car.

Unable to toss anything out the window, my son had crawled out himself, and like an episode of MacGyver was on the roof, making his way toward the hood of the car. I got him down, put him back in the car, explained as best I could that he was not MacGyver and could have been hurt. I got him home without further incident. Thankfully, the next day I got my own car back. After that I was much more careful about what DC watched.



Saturday, October 1, 2016

The Day I Made Lemon Chicken for Oliver Sacks

It all started when I was sitting with the late Wayne Gilpin and the rest of the then board of the Autism Society of America in the Banyan Tree. It was 1993. At the time, I was the president of ASA and Wayne was treasurer. We had run against each other for president and he had been surprised and a little ticked off at losing. To get him to agree to be treasurer, I had to make a deal that he'd be in charge of the international conference in Toronto. The bar we all sat in was in the hotel that housed it.

Neither Wayne nor I was interested in drinking, so we talked to each other. A presenter had just pulled out of the conference and I made a proposal to be a fill-in. I would talk about my family: The Autism Family. We had an empty session and Wayne had nothing to lose, so he agreed.

I wrote that night until one A.M., filling page after page of a legal pad with my presentation. Only slightly bleary, I presented it the next morning. I told the room about my two sons at very different functioning levels. There wasn't much news in that. Then I dropped the bomb. In the late '80”s Edward Ritvo, then the head of the Neuropsychiatric Institute at UCLA, wrote a letter to an Autism Journal, outlining ten anonymous high functioning adult phenotypes of autism. Two of those ten were my husband and me. Even though the fact was known to members of my local autism community, especially since Dr. Ritvo referred other high functioning adults to me, it had never been announced to the world at large. Both my husband and I had careers that might have been adversely affected. Most people still saw autism in terms of Dustin Hoffman's portrayal in Rainman. It wouldn't have done our health insurance any good either. So when I let the news out, I did it outside the country.

The room where I did my presentation was packed. I gave, among other things, my personal experience with what stimming felt like, and tricks I used to appear as normal as possible in public. I found out later that there were people from thirty-eight countries present. At the end, a woman came up with tears in her eyes, to thank me. The audio tape was the second best seller at the conference, with only that of a well known person with autism ahead of it. It was also referenced by the keynote speaker at the plenary session. He had listened to it before he presented his own talk.

Sometime after I'd returned to where I lived in California, I got a call at the metal finishing plant where I was working as chemist and Q.C. manager. It was a representative for Oliver Sacks. I was told that the woman who had approached me after my presentation was Mira Rothenberg, author of Children with Emerald Eyes and pioneer in the treatment of children with autism and schizophrenia. She and Dr. Sacks were friends and she had convinced him that he needed to meet with our family for a new book he was writing. I was all for meeting someone on whom a Robin Williams movie was based, so I agreed.

Dr. Sacks arrived to see our family later than planned, getting caught in California traffic. He was charmingly apologetic. He also brought several of his books, which he autographed and gave to me. Insisting we call him “Oliver,” he spent the day. I made hamburgers for lunch and lemon chicken for supper. He was fascinated by the process, accompanying my higher functioning older son to the backyard to pick a fresh lemon I had requested. He confessed that his custom was to have someone cook him a pot of bouillabaisse, to last the week. He hadn't expected to like the chicken, cutting himself a small piece from his portion on the serving plate, then later eating the whole thing.

The one thing that stands out most in my memory, was watching him stare at my lower functioning younger son, typing rapidly at a computer completely by touch, a skill he had taught himself. He exclaimed, “What a strange creature!”
If anyone else had said something like that, I would have asked them to leave my house. In his case, I didn't get mad, because it was merely an astonished observation.

Dr. Sacks took off after supper. His next stop was to be to see Temple Grandin in Colorado. Temple and I knew each other because we'd worked together on the National Board. Oliver gave her a tape of my presentation in Canada, and after she listened to it, she called me. We talked for a long time.

Oliver had asked if it was all right to use our family's name or if we wanted him to disguise us. He even offered to put us in another state. I told him that California would be fine, but asked that he change our name.

As it turned out, we, as “Family B,” got a paragraph. Temple got the rest of the chapter. Even so, from Oliver's description of our home, every one from the local ASA chapter who'd ever come to our house for meetings, knew it was us anyway. I didn't mind. They weren't the ones I was concerned with fooling. When the book came out, Oliver sent me an autographed copy, which I still treasure.



The most wonderful thing that came out of Dr. Sacks' visit was that for a while we became pen pals. He wrote on a real typewriter with a ribbon that badly needed changing, but his letters were well worth reading. At the time, the neurotransmitter focus in autism was on dopamine and serotonin. Because of my younger son's extreme sensitivity to monosodium glutamate (MSG), I suggested that medications involving the glutamate system might be more helpful. Oliver was very encouraging when I proposed my theory. It was a joy and a relief to have his attention. In the end, at least where my son was concerned, I proved to be correct. Glutamate protective substances greatly improve his behavior. That day with Oliver Sacks, and our correspondence afterward, helped to improve my son's life and mine. I will always be grateful.

Check out my philosophy and all my books at http://autismnovelist.com

and https://www.amazon.com/-/e/B01BJBY72U


Friday, September 16, 2016

When They Grow Up

An autism diagnosis for your child is devastating, but it comes with an element of hope. There are autistic characters on TV using their savant skills to solve crimes or crack computers. Programs hawk incredible changes. Then there is all that research. Your child will be in school until he's in his twenties, by then there will be a solution right? Everything will be just fine.

There are many possible futures, but unfortunately this is one that is not uncommon.

Your child has become a man or a woman, most likely a man, and things are not fine. They're not fine at all. It's not like what they show on TV. All that research worked great on mice but didn't do much for human beings. And those programs that promised to make your son look and act normal, they didn't. His spoken language has the syntax of a two year old and he has regular meltdowns, pinching or sinking his teeth into the nearest person who can't duck or get away in time. Often that person is you. Now what do you do?”

Okay, you can take time for a good cry, but after that you need to get busy. Services are usually provided by medicaid waiver. That means doing lots of paper work. You have to do it. Get on every list you can. Even if you don't need the services, the need may sneak up on you. If there's a waiting for housing or respite, even if it is years long, make sure you get on it too. Eventually you will reach the top.

Cling to whomever his willing to help, whether it is your family, your friends, or your religious institution.


Most of all, take care of yourself. You are in this for the long haul. Perhaps there will be a cure and if that happens, it will be wonderful. But you have to cope with the present. Remember to sleep. Remember to eat. Find something you love to do and do it. Be checked for high blood presure. It happens to parents of individual with autism --- a lot. The last thing you need is a heart attavk or a stroke. And believe you can do it. You can.

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Only the Father.

I just remembered a funny thing that happened when my son DC was in school. However primitive his speech may be, his computer skills are anything but. He comes by them honestly through his father, who hs been a computer professional since the sixties. DC is very possessive about computers and his time on them. He managed to lock everyone out of a computer belonging to his school.

Usually my husband and I were notified of everything DC did, via his communication book, but not about this incident. Perhaps the school was embarrassed. They had called in two computer experts to fix the problem, to no avail. A few days later, when my husband and I were attending a PTA meeting when one of the teachers sheepishly confessed about the problem to my husband. It took my husband about five minutes to straighten it out and give the school access to their computer again.


Only the father could undo the work of the son.

Thursday, September 1, 2016

Mix 3

You can get these flours from Bobs Red Mill. They are certified Gluten Free by Elisa testing. You can cut the amounts if you like. I actually prefer baking by weight. I will give those values as well

                                            Small batch

4 cups amaranth flour  480g         144g
4 cups tapioca flour     480g         144g
3 cups arrowroot flour 384g         115g


Chocolate Chunk Cookies

2/3 c shortening           105g
1/2 c sugar                  105g
1/2 c brown sugar         81g
1 TBSP water               24g
1 large egg                     53g                 
1 tsp vanilla                      2g
1 1/2 c mix 3                207g
1/2 tsp baking soda           3g
1/2 tsp salt                        3g
6 0z or 604g Enjoy Life dairy, nut and soy free Mega Chunks Semi Sweet

Preheat oven to 375 degrees F. Cover cookie sheets with  parchment.

Cream shortening, sugars, and water. Add egg and vanill and mix intil smooth. Add dry ingredients except for chocolate chunks. Mix until smooth. Blend in chocolate chunks.  Drop by heaping teaspoons on cookie sheets. You may form into balls by hand for more even cookies. Bake about 10 minutes or until light brown. Cool two minutes on cookies sheets and transfer to cooling racks. You should have 3-4 dozen cookies.

Hints:
For flours: bobsredmill.com
You can get the chocolate chunks on Amazon.
Try to make your cookie sheets full, cookies are less likely to burn.

Saturday, August 27, 2016

A Tale of Two Sons

I have raised two sons with autism. They wear the same size shoe, but that's where the similarity ends. While pregnant, I did everything I could to assure there wouldn't be any problems with the boys. I saw the doctor regularly, ate well, didn't smoke, and consumed no caffeine or alcohol. I also made the decision to have my children by natural childbirth, not wishing to expose them to anesthetics. When you make plans, God laughs.

When my older son JJ was born, he had the cord around his neck, a low Apgar, a white blaze in his hair, and rarely stopped crying. He rapidly developed a skin rash as well and gained almost no weight. As it turned out, he was allergic to the cream we had been given in the hospital. As a precaution, his doctor declared that he could have only breast milk, wear only cotton cloth diapers and cotton clothes, and that his clothes be washed only in Ivory Snow. Under that regimen his weight gain rose to normal levels, but he still cried often and didn't sleep through the night for nine months, about the same time he transitioned from breast milk to soy milk. We took him straight to cup, which after an agonized outburst I will never forget, he seemed to accept well.

When JJ was less than a year old, my husband was offered what he felt was a better job in California. I was uncomfortable with the idea of moving. We had only lived in Saint Paul for two years, but I had made friends there and a friend I already had from college lived there too and was a willing babysitter. JJ's pediatrician was in St. Paul as well and he had been both available and extremely diligent. Still, my husband's parents lived in California, so we would be gaining proximity to grandparents. It seemed like a reasonable trade. JJ did remarkably well on the cross country trip, and seemed to have made a developmental leap. Other than complaining loudly in the morning if he wasn't immediately fed rice cereal and soy formula, he was such a happy baby, so much so that people at the hotel where we were housed for our first month remarked on in it. To everyone's further amusement, he had begun to crawl very rapidly, scooting down corridors at warp speed.

Other than picking up colds and respiratory infections we had never seen in St. Paul, and crying his heart out in the church nursery, JJ seemed to be doing well in California. When he was eighteen months old, I went back to work at night, leaving him in the care of a fellow choir member from church during the hours I slept. A week before he was two, he surprised us all by beginning to read spontaneously. His first word was gleaned from a commercial, “Wards.” The second was like it, “Sears.” All the brands of cars soon followed.

We really thought we had a genius on our hands, but he was confounding. He was a relatively late walker, and when I started him at the local daycare at age two, had trouble adjusting. He was also very difficult to potty train and was limited in his interactions with other children. In some ways he was Jekyll and Hyde. He had a sunny smile both adults and other children loved, but could also become extremely angry and even bit other children. His fine motor skills were excellent, his writing and drawing way ahead of other children his age, but his gross motor skills poor. He could barely manage age appropriate play equipment. JJ entered an advanced kindergarten at a magnet school because of his advanced reading skills, but the school nurse saw soft neurological signs. A visit to a neurologist produced a diagnosis of minimal brain dysfunction, but the doctor involved told us he really thought JJ was fine and was using the diagnosis to get insurance to pay. JJ was still having so much trouble relating to the other children, we decided, even though we could scarcely afford it, to send him to private school.

When JJ was four, his younger brother DC was born. His birth, again without anesthesia, seemed flawless. His Apgar was high and his early developmental milestones, including walking, were for the most part ahead of schedule. I thought that the second time around, I had the easy one. Then things began to change. At ten months, he weaned himself, pushing the breast away. I was disappointed, as I had been hanging out with some women with the La Leche League and would have been more than happy to continue. As he approached age two, I watched with dismay as he lost words he had acquired early, until he was finally mute. His skills regressed from ahead of normal, back to the level of three months. At first we thought he had lost his hearing, but that proved not to be the case. Finally at age two and a half he was diagnosed with autism. At the same time, his brother went from a bogus diagnosis for minimal brain dysfunction, to a real one, for autism in the residual state.

DC, diagnosed young, had interventions of all kind, practically from the start. We went together to UCLA, where we had a course from a therapist following the teachings of Ivar Lovaas, the basis for ABA. He had speech therapy. He had another therapist, in our home, trained by Lovaas himself. He was in special eduction from the outset and stayed there throughout his school career to age twenty-two.

After two years in a private school, JJ went back to public school. At various stages he was in regular, gifted, and learning disabled classes. He had speech therapy, which was less than successful, something that was blamed on him by his therapists. He had social skills training which had more impact. The most useful things he had were a cub scout troop with normal kids and youth group at the church. Both were great socializing experiences. In High School he was the only child they'd ever had who was both working under an IEP and up for valedictorian.

Fast forward. JJ, my older son, the one who was born with obvious problems, now is almost forty and has two bachelors degrees, a masters, and a PhD. He works in a government laboratory in another state, lives fine on his own, and comes home for Christmas. In many way's JJ was the jumping off point for my novel,Dark Awakening.

DC, who at first seemed the golden child, lives in a house not far from us, with one roommate and twenty-four hour staff. He's thirty-five. The only paying job he has ever had, he was only able to hold for about three weeks. He is brilliant with computers, but his behaviors keep him from capitalizing on that skill. He reads and writes well, but his spoken language would be primitive for a two year old.

What one might take away from this is that early intervention, even when delivered by experts, promises no happy ending. Another conclusion might be that all is not lost without it. Both are possibly true, but a better thought is that persons with autism, even in the same family, can have very different courses and very different outcomes. The happiest one is that even the most difficult baby can turn out pretty well.





Tuesday, August 23, 2016


My Latest Interview

Why did you write your story about a detective that sings instead of talking?
I have two sons with autism. I noticed that for them, and other kids with communication difficulties, it was easier to understand something that was sung than something that was spoken. With a little research, I realized that music and spoken speech are handled differently in the brain. I decided that singing would be one way my hero, Cary, would cope with his challenges.
Who/what inspires you the most in your writing?
First of all, my experience with my, and other parents' challenged kids. I am also inspired by everyday events. I take a cue from politics, from what is going on at church, and from what is happening in the world. I pay attention to how people interact with their families and how their experiences differ from my own.
How did you discover you could maintain your sanity with writing?
When my children were young, life was very difficult. We had almost no help from family and little from friends. I was feeling overwhelmed and isolated. Writing gave me a safe place to be and yet a way to reach out. I could retreat there whenever I needed a refuge.
How did it comfort you?
Writing is an antidote to powerlessness. I am a control freak, but much of what has happened in my life has been out of my control. In writing, I can create a world I would like to live in. I can create language, culture, religion, and even music. I can punish villains and allow heroes to triumph.
What are your key messages in your books/writing?
One of my key messages is that people who are different have value. You don't have to straddle the norms to have a place in society. I also write that having scruples and wanting to do the right thing, even when it seems there is no obvious profit in it, can work out for the best.
What is so unique about your first GFCF cookbook?
When I wrote my first GFCF cookbook there was almost nothing gluten free in the stores. I was pretty much on my own developing what later became wildly popular. Adding in casein free was an additional complication. I also tested my recipes on people with and without autism. At the time, I was just concerned with putting out recipes that would actually work and taste good. There are many more gluten free ingredients and products readily available now. That has enabled me to design basic mixes that simplify things for busy caregivers. One thing that has not changed is the shortage of casein free ingredients. Due to the vagaries of the law, foods listed as dairy free may still contain casein. That means that in my new cookbook, I'm still compensating for what is not readily available in the market.
What are the two novels born out of your experience in the autism world?
As I am now finishing up a third, there are three. The first is Singing the Solution, about the Detective Cary Ellis, who has an easier time singing than talking. Cary also has many of the social deficits that are seen in autism, as well as sensory processing difficulties. He also has some of the savant-type skills associated with high functioning autism, and puts them to work solving crimes. Singing the Solution is serialized on Channillo.com. 
Dark Awakening, published by Snow Leopard is available on Amazon and on the Snow Leopard site. http://tinyurl.com/zde74tm It is about an autistic vampire. Some of his symptoms, especially sensory problems, are eased when he is turned, but he still maintains his social awkwardness and his stubborn adherence to what he feels is right. Despite that, he makes a place for himself in the world and is able to aid others as well. The book also illustrates that even persons with autism are capable of loving, and loving deeply. The sequel further explores those themes. I've heard from many readers who are anxiously awaiting its arrival.